March-April 2006

  • 1
  • 2

Advantages Flow From Divided Waste Stream

Expanding the capacity of its Plant Atkinson site near Atlanta by erecting a second transfer building helped Waste Management split a single trash flow into two, money-saving waste streams.

Article Tools

Create a Link to this Article

By Steve Cribb

Comments

The new $3.4 million, four-sided, state-of-the art building at Waste Management Inc.’s Plant Atkinson facility also reduced the plant’s operational costs, while meeting the community’s ecological needs. Revamping the existing facility to handle the greater volume of waste met with several challenges, including residential pressures and permitting for landscaping and stormwater management.

In 2001, the southern group director of engineering for Waste Management, Ray Chewning, selected Golder Associates Inc. and Hornsby & Associates in Atlanta to incorporate his unique ideas in the design of a four-sided transfer building and onsite improvements at the existing Plant Atkinson facility. While the original facility stood on about five acres, the new construction would expand the site nearly eight more. While the initial design was completed that same year, project construction didn’t begin until late in 2004. Today, the building coexists with the original, three-sided building. Together they provide the facility capacity to handle about 2,500 tons a day with improved environmental performance.

Meeting the Need
Although the site was already partially developed, local government authorities required that Waste Management treat the site as undeveloped with regard to county landscaping requirements, which added expense to the project. Waste Management eventually planted 254 trees and numerous smaller shrubs to conform to the county’s point-evaluation system for landscaping requirements.

In addition to the extensive planting, Waste Management also agreed to include noise reduction in the landscaping plan. “We contoured the site with what would become low, grassy knolls to lessen noise. That also improved the appearance of the site,” said Chewning.

He also selected the Stormwater Management StormFilter from Stormwater360 to reduce contaminants in any runoff from the site. “We saw no other solution that met the state’s industrial stormwater permit requirements,” he said.

Although the Plant Atkinson facility location is zoned industrial, residential neighborhoods have been encroaching on the area for several years. To address the concerns of residents now in the vicinity, Waste Management held several meetings. The meetings helped local residents understand the community benefits of the facility expansion and how the landscaping and the new four-sided building improved visual appeal of the site. The company also explained how the stormwater collection and treatment system upgrades would improve the quality of the surface water discharged from the site.

A closed, four-sided building at Waste Management's Plant Atkinson facility also reduced the plant's operational costs and met the community's ecological concerns.

Advertisement

Splitting the Wastestream
The new building not only expanded the facility’s capacity, but also allowed Waste Management to split its MSW and C&D streams into two operations, each handled by a separate building at the site. The older building handles C&D, and the newer one MSW, allowing the company to reduce its operational costs by sending its debris streams to the appropriate landfill rather than sending everything to a more expensive lined landfill. “Breaking up our wastestreams not only reduced our costs, but now we can send construction debris to an unlined landfill, which further reduces our operational costs,” explained Chewning.

Stormwater Considerations
The two buildings provided the opportunity to divide water discharge into two streams—leachate and washwater that require municipal sewage treatment and stormwater that can be handled differently. As part of the new construction, Waste Management needed to meet Georgia’s requirements for handling runoff from 4.2 acres of impervious surface in the expansion area. “Before construction, our onsite water was cross-contaminating, making us treat any runoff from the facility as wastewater, which required that we treat it municipally,” said Chewning, who’s responsible for the stormwater management on the site. The new building includes many features designed specifically to prevent such cross-contamination.

Next Page >
  • 1
  • 2

What Do You Think?

Post a Comment

Be the first to tell us what you think!

Post a Comment

Not a subscriber? Sign Up
 
 
*  
 




 

Get MSW Email Updates!

Get weekly news and updates through our MSW email newsletter!