May 2010

Save...or Sell?

What can we do about slow markets for recyclables?

Article Tools

Create a Link to this Article

Photo Credit: Los Angeles County Sanitation Districts

By Paul Hull

Comments

When people aren’t buying cars, freezers, or televisions the makers slow production; when customers stay home, retailers cut staff and lower inventory; when the grass gets too long, we cut it. But we cannot always follow such practical techniques when the demand for recyclables is down, as it has been for several months. We cannot simply tell our residents and businesses to stop producing waste, and recycling is not simply a fad we practice when we can profit from our efforts. Recycling is a lifetime habit that can benefit every community, every municipality, and every home. The cuts by makers of hard goods and the downsizing by retailers and service companies bring difficult days for many people. Is there any way we can continue to deal in recyclables without hurting our communities?

Do we save our recyclables for the day when the prices go up? That seems practical, but are there limits to how much we can save? Some communities are simply storing their excess recyclable waste at local sites that have been unused so far. If your community is in the crowded states on the coastal edges of the country, there may not be much suitable empty space. In the more central areas there seems to be more space, so some communities are just storing their scrap metal and plastic waste, for example, until the market improves and the price is right again.

A word heard in reference to this problem is “sequestration.” That word has specific legal and ecclesiastical connotations, but it is used here, in waste management, in the sense that sequestration is the same as temporary storage. Excess recyclables would be sequestered…set apart, isolated, secluded.

Sequestration also seems to imply that government action may be needed, perhaps to supply places for the storage, perhaps to do anything to prevent the recyclables from going to the landfill. Sequestration of wastes would keep them available (and safe) until they could be sold to the reviving markets.

The sequestration, dumping, or storage ground must be acceptable, too. As Wes Muir of WM Recycle America (the recycling arm of Waste Management), pointed out to me, some recyclables have a definite shelf life. WM Recycle America handles a broad range of recyclable commodities, including metals, glass, electronics, plastics, and fibers such as newspaper, office paper, and cardboard. We cannot simply dump them all for an unstated amount of time, even underground in unused mines, as some people have suggested. Fibrous materials offer other challenges than metals, so everything cannot be treated in the same way. Storage is less of a problem for those with plenty of space available, but it would be wrong to imagine that the biggest companies or counties involved in collecting and marketing recyclables are immune to the ups and downs of the market, or the challenges of storing specific materials.

Whose Responsibility?
“Who would do the sequestration?” asked John Hadfield, recently retired after 30 years at the Southeastern Public Service Authority in Virginia (about a decade as its executive director). He has been a busy member and officer of SWANA, too, and is presently the organization’s president. “Would the collector do the storing or sequestration, and who would pay for this added cost? I see that cost is often more important in the absence of regulatory requirements, and that recycling goes down the drain when times are tough, as they are now. Until recycling our waste becomes an inherent aspect of the American psyche, it will be commonplace to see folks throwing in the towel when economic issues are tough.” Hadfield says he suspects that unprocessed recyclables are treated, for regulatory purposes, like a municipal waste, with that concept more likely in single-stream collection programs. “The underlying component of the idea to sequester our recyclables is that we should not be landfilling anything in the future. I absolutely agree with that. We are not making any more land resources and it is absolutely stupid, wasteful, and should be blasphemous, that we allow anything to be disposed of in this way.” Those are stern, practical words from a person with great experience in waste management. Many professionals agree with him.

Concerning safety and public health, as we must, the wisest municipal sanitation districts make sure their space for storage is correctly prepared and lined. One gentleman with whom I spoke is executive director of Lancaster County Solid Waste Management Authority in Pennsylvania. Jim Warner’s group started storing its excess metal wastes in the last months of 2008, having no issues with the EPA because of the liners already installed. He mentioned 1,700 tons stored at one place and thought it would be a temporary situation.

Advertisement

The big difference I noticed between that Pennsylvanian solution and most other counties with whom I corresponded was that Lancaster County knew what it was going to do if the recyclables exceeded their demand temporarily. Now it is after the event of the 2008 downturn in recyclable demand. The time to determine what will happen for the rest of this year and next year is now, not when it happens and the media send out panic signals and pictures. “Just-in-time” management has had its proponents over recent years, but it does presume that the preparations for that “just-in-time” success have been made well ahead of time.

Jim Warner gave a presentation to the SWANA Senior Executive Seminar in January that revealed some careful planning, budgeting, and suggestions for reducing costs in waste management. Those aspects of waste management can play a crucial role in your community’s success. A recent survey noted that, while about 55% of communities agreed lack of funds was their greatest challenge to solving public works problems, almost a third said it was the traditional, never-change attitude of “community leaders” that could be responsible for no progress. An interesting and disappointing aspect of the SWANA meeting mentioned above was that very few attendees showed much interest in the concept of storage as a way to stabilize market supply, and not much interest in the end markets for the materials at all. Next Page >

What Do You Think?

Post a Comment

Be the first to tell us what you think!

Post a Comment

Not a subscriber? Sign Up
 
 
*  
 




 

Get MSW Email Updates!

Get weekly news and updates through our MSW email newsletter!